There are lots of myths in education and education reporting, and the Columbia Journalism Review highlights one of them in its latest post (The Texas school board isn't as powerful as you think), calling out Reuters, the Washington Post, The Atlantic, Vice, and the Brownsville Herald (and praising the AP and the Houston Chronicle).
"The Texas-textbook story is not the same as it was when the board approved materials in 2002. Reporters should not be telling it as if it is."
In a lengthy post, CJR points out that the familiar narrative of an all-powerful school board setting the textbook agenda for the nation is outdated and inaccurate "As far back as 2010, professionals in the textbook industry were already telling the Texas Tribune that the story about the state school board’s influence was “an urban myth.” But it's fun and easy to retell, focusing as it does on Texas, religion, and dysfunctional education bureaucracy. So folks jump on it, whether they know better or not.
What's CJR get wrong or leave out? What other myths are still getting passed along by education reporters and media outlets? Vox's Libby Anderson recently highlighted 5 things about standardized testing that you don't always find in testing stories. I'm sure there are others out there.
Related posts: Why Journos Overstate Federal Influence; Please Do A Better Job Covering Testing This Year, Journos; 6 Key Critiques Of Media Coverage Of Education; How Reporters Got Sucked Into Value-Added Debacle; Researcher Fails To Disclose Union Funding; Journos Fail To Ask.